ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: BD Canada recently released a blood collection tube with a novel mechanical separator called the Barricor. We evaluated this tube as an alternate sample type for cardiac troponin I (cTnI) testing using the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI+3 assay. DESIGN AND METHODS: 3014 paired patient specimens (Barricor, plasma separator tube or PST) were obtained from the emergency departments and cardiac care units of nine hospitals in and around Edmonton, Alberta. After centrifugation, each plasma sample was analyzed for cTnI using the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI+3 assay. In addition, selected samples were analyzed multiple times within a single run or over 4-5days to generate imprecision data for the assay. RESULTS: Repeatability and within-laboratory studies revealed an imprecision of <10% at concentrations above 0.025µg/L for the Barricor as well as BD's traditional PST. Paired patient sample comparisons over the full range of the assay yielded linear regression slopes ranging from 0.956 to 1.011 and Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.993 to 0.999. At a lower range of results closer to the manufacturer's 99th percentile cutoffs correlation was slightly worse, but still acceptable, with linear regression slopes ranging from 0.967 to 1.211 and Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.983 to 0.987. Notably, at these lower concentrations the agreement between individual PST and Barricor results worsened with decreasing cTnI concentration. Differences between pairs of results became particularly large (-50 to +400%) at PST cTnI concentrations ≤0.015µg/L. Closer inspection of the data around the 0.02 and 0.04µg/L 99th percentile cutoffs revealed a number of discordances between PST and Barricor results, with at least some of these attributable to false elevations in the PST results. CONCLUSIONS: Together, our results suggest that the Barricor blood collection tube is good alternative to the traditional PST for cTnI testing using the AccuTnI+3 assay. The Barricor appears to minimize spurious, nonreproducible, and false elevations in cTnI results for a subset of patients but additional studies are needed to determine if it reduces overall false elevations. cTnI results below 0.04µg/L may still be of questionable accuracy even with the use of this new tube.
